Originally published on Diagonal, nº 179, p. 33.
(Thanks to Richard McAleavey for the translation! :-)
‘The cutbacks announced by Rajoy will deepen the recession until
2013’: thus read the El País headline on the package of measures that
starts off the imperial economic protectorate of the EU and the markets.
The headline, however, could have been another one no less consistent
or resounding: “It’s not a crisis! It’s a scam!”. After all, we are
witnessing the worst extortion operation we have ever known.
Extortion, let us recall, is an ‘offence that consists of forcing
–through violence or intimidation- the commission or omission of an act
or commercially motivated legal transaction with a view to making money
and with the intention of causing material loss to the victim or a third
party’. In this case, the intimidation is that exercised by the
markets, and the act or commercially motivated legal transaction is the
measures approved in Las Cortes with the goal of ruining the lives of
the 99% to the benefit of the 1%.
But is there really a crisis?
The explicit awareness that the measures not only do not remedy, but
prolong and deepen the crisis reveals something far more worrying, if
this were possible, than the obvious irresponsibility of misrule.
Namely, that 1) the national State is no longer the centre of modern
sovereign power, 2) liberal democracy and representative government have
failed institutionally to reconcile capital and labour; 3) the command
that rules us today operates somewhere midway between supranational
institutions like the EU and financial institutions like ratings
agencies (to cite two obvious examples of a far more complex network.
With things this way, what kind of (mis)government is it that is
based on continuing to deliberately aggravate the suffering of the
citizens? An illegitimate government no doubt. It
is also, as we have pointed out, a government that is nothing of the
sort, but instead the transmission belt of decision-making bodies no
less illegitimate, given that they evade all democratic control. But
above all, it is a (mis)government that responds to a logic that must be
diagnosed in its functioning, denounced in its effects and fought with
an effective strategy.
Kleptocracy
The logic of (mis)government can be identified with a type of regime
that is established with each measure that gets approved: kleptocracy.
From the Greek kleptēs or theft and kratos or rule, it
can be defined as “government of those who steal”. Given that we are
speaking of an illegitimate robbery, one can say, straight out, the
“government of thieves”. It is a matter of a kind of regime that
consists not of governing from, by and for the demos (as in democracy), but in the service of the logic of the priva(tisa)tion of resources that were once public.
A simple example: if university fees go up and only a minority can
pay them, but we all fund public universities with our taxes equally,
where is the redistribution of wealth? Where is the equality of
opportunities? Where are the principles of the welfare State? Where is
the Constitution? This, however, is how kleptocracy works: it subtracts
from the 99% to give to the 1%.
Debt is the mechanism that makes legalised robbery possible: the
private debt which through illegitimate means is converted into public
debt; the debt which, like a deus ex machina condemns us to
poverty. Debt today consumes the future and, equally, reduces people’s
existence to its merely vegetative dimension. This is why stopping the
payments is an imperative in the defence of a decent life. Faced with a
rule that appears before us as a financial automatism, it is today
urgent to move forward along the route of disobedience, in autonomous
empowerment, towards the political regime of the commons.
